Friday, 24 March 2017

Suicide killers and the limits of the liberal imagination



The Westminster murderer came from Deptford in North Kent and not from a Muslim background. He was born Adrian Elms, to a white mother and a black father. He was a thug who had a long history of violent crime. He converted to Islam (like the man who beheaded Drummer Rigby in Woolwich and several other murderers), changed his name to Khalid Masood and grew a beard without a moustache.

He spent a lot of time in prison and some time in Saudi Arabia.

In his CV, which was sent out a few weeks ago, he described himself as “British”, “friendly and approachable” and a good listener. 


What is to be done to stop such people? I really do not know. But it is interesting to read the suggestions made in the press, which make clear the limits of the liberal imagination.

And this time by liberal I mean the word on all its seemingly mutually contradictory senses: the liberalism of Hillary Clinton and the EU and the classical liberalism of the Victorians. 

The Times editorial this morning says, "It is baffling to most people that decades of exposure to British values can leave someone so willing to kill and be killed in a death cult masquerading as a religion".

Do you find it baffling, dear reader, that exposure to 'British values' does not deter suicide killers? I don't. Any more than going to a church school prevents people growing up to be thieves or adulterers. 

In fact, there is much about British values to dislike, from many widely differing points of view. Even if there were not, there is no limit to how contrarian or perverse human beings often are.

Violent Islamism, like fascism, communism, the Green movement and other extremist nonsense, is a critique of British values. 

But my point is that we should all urgently rethink the world view that not only finds evil baffling but finds extremism baffling. 

Human beings are dangerous. Out of the crooked timbers of mankind no straight thing was ever made. De Maistre said civilisation depended on the hangman. Now that hanging has been abolished, civilisation depends on powerful armies, an effective police and on prisons - yet prisons are the universities where Islamists are created.

The Times talks about the successful de-Nazification of Germany but de-Nazification was effective because Germans had perished in huge numbers during two world wars that they had lost, because Germany was divided, ruled by foreigners and a third of Germany was enduring Communism. The discovery of the millions of Jews killed in gas chambers played a part too, though only in West Germany, not in socialist East Germany.

I'd say that Islamism resembles the extremism that swirled around Vienna and Munich before and immediately after the 1914-18 War rather than the situation in 1945.





Thursday, 23 March 2017

We are at war with an idea, one that kills people


This article has been published in Taki's Magazine.   



Yesterday several people were murdered just outside the House of Commons. Killing people outside security barriers makes much better sense for a terrorist than trying to pass them, though the murderer tried to do that too in the end, before being shot dead.

Tim Stanley, the British journalist and historian, spoke for many when he called it “A barbaric attack. Monstrous for shedding blood, but impotent because it will not change us or our way of life.” Lots and lots of other people said the same thing.

They may be right. There’s no way of knowing. I hope, though, that they're wrong and that it does change us. Change, for example, our ideas about immigration and about the multicultural future of Europe. 


For some reason, there is a great reluctance to discuss the link between terrorism and immigration. Instead, we get appeals not to blame Muslims for a few bad or mentally ill people in their midst.

So much mental illness these days.

Wednesday, 22 March 2017

Well happ'd on, brother-ranger of the brine!

A mixed bag of quotations today.




Formerly no one was allowed to think freely; now it is permitted, but no one is capable of it any more. Now people want to think only what they are supposed to think, and this they consider freedom. Oswald Spengler


A true friend is the greatest of all blessings, and that which we take the least care of all to acquire. Duc De La Rochefoucauld



But we are like the leaves that flowery spring

puts forth, quick spreading in the sun's warm light:

for a brief span of time we take our joy

in our youth's bloom, the future, good or ill,

kept from us, while the twin dark Dooms stand by, 


one bringing to fulfillment harsh old age,

the other, death. The ripeness of youth's fruit

is short, short as the sunlight on the earth,

and once this season of perfection's past,

it's better to be dead than stay alive. 


All kinds of worry come. One man's estate

is failing, and there's painful poverty;

another has no sons—the keenest need

one feels as one goes down below the earth;

sickness wears down another's heart. There's none

Zeus does not give a multitude of ills.

Mimnermus, fragment 2 (tr. M.L. West)



That’s what turns young men and women into writers—the happiness you discover living in books. Paul Auster

A religion without orthodoxy is destined to be swept away by the first breath of doubt. Sir Roger Scruton, '
Gentle Regrets' 


Well happ'd on, brother-ranger of the brine!

This has always been one of my favourite lines of bad verse, spoken by Gorm to Froda in 'Ethelstan; or, The battle of Brunanburgh, a dramatic chronicle', by George Darley. More of this glorious play is here.

Monday, 20 March 2017

Six thoughts


Bolshevism combines the characteristics of the French Revolution with those of the rise of Islam… Those who accept Bolshevism become impervious to scientific evidence, and commit intellectual suicide. Even if all the doctrines of Bolshevism were true, this would still be the case, since no unbiased examination of them is tolerated…Among religions, Bolshevism is to be reckoned with Mohammedanism rather than with Christianity and Buddhism. Christianity and Buddhism are primarily personal religions, with mystical doctrines and a love of contemplation. Mohammedanism and Bolshevism are practical, social, unspiritual, concerned to win the empire of the world. Bertrand Russell in a letter written from Russia  in 1920, published in 
Uncertain Paths to Freedom: Russia and China, 1919-22

We do not know whether Hitler is going to found a new Islam. He is already on the way; he is like Mohammad. The emotion in Germany is Islamic; warlike and Islamic. They are all drunk with wild god. That can be the historic future. Carl Jung, The Symbolic Life (1939)

All of us need an identity which unites us with our neighbours, our countrymen, those people who are subject to the same rules and the same laws as us, those people with whom we might one day have to fight side by side to protect our inheritance, those people with whom we will suffer when attacked, those people whose destinies are in some way tied up with our own. Sir Roger Scruton


Saturday, 18 March 2017

Emil Cioran predicts the end of European civilisation

Vacillating instincts, corroded beliefs, obsessions, and anility: everywhere conquerors in retreat, rentiers of heroism confronting the young Alarics who lie in wait for Rome and Athens; everywhere paradoxes of the lymphatic. There was a time when salon sallies traversed whole countries, foiled stupidity or refined it. Europe, coquettish and intractable, was in the flower of her age; — decrepit today, Europe excites no one. Even so, certain barbarians await their chance to inherit the finery, impatient at her long agony.
The Romanian aphorist Emil Cioran, in Syllogismes d’Amerture (1952) - the English translation of the book is here. 

It's interesting that he said this before the Algerian War, when Algeria still constituted three departments of France.

Pessimism was to Cioran what daffodils were to Wordsworth or butlers to P.G. Wodehouse. Cioran even achieved the feat of being too pessimistic for Samuel Beckett. This broke up their friendship.

Friday, 17 March 2017

The right and wrong kind of populism

The Dutch Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, whose government came first in Wednesday's election, has said Geert Wilders represented 'the wrong kind of populism'. 

Mr. Wilders replied that he did not consider himself a populist and wondered what the Prime Minister considered the right kind of populism.

But I think Mr Wilders is deluding himself. He wants the Koran banned and mosques closed down. This means he is a populist and also a demagogue, by almost any definition.

His proposals on the Koran and mosques will never, I hope, be implemented. The proposals can only sow enmity between Dutch Muslims and non-Muslims. And alienating Dutch Muslims is the most dangerous thing that could happen. It is exactly what ISIS and the extremists want.

I imagine that many people who voted for Mr Wilders feel the same. But they don't care. 

They voted for him to signal that they want an end to Muslim immigration into Holland. 

As the mainstream parties do not offer this they vote for Geert Wilders instead. 

This reflects the profound wisdom of ordinary people, who are keen observers of life. They know that you should not vote for things you like. You should always vote against things you don't like.

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

Geert Wilders does not want to be Dutch Prime Minister and President Le Pen is a very long shot

'It is not that France has become Le Penist, reality has become Le Penist.' 
Elisabeth Levy, the French feminist writer
'I said the evening of Trump’s election that this is not the end of the world, it’s the end of a world. The EU world is ultra-liberalism, savage globalisation, artificially created across nations. I believe that this world is dead.' 
Marine Le Pen

A lot of things that should be obvious are not obvious to people who write for what used to be called the papers and are now called the mainstream media.

For example, Geert Wilders has no chance of being Dutch Prime Minister after today's election. This is because the Dutch constitution is designed to prevent rule by one party. 

Just to make it sure it doesn't happen he has gone out of his way recently, for example by referring to 'Moroccan scum' (he explained that he meant criminals who were Moroccan and not Moroccans in general, but it sounded very extreme), to ensure that almost all of the other parties pledged not to ally with him. 

He does not want the cares of office, which would destroy his career, at this stage at least. He naturally wants to change the political discourse from the opposition.

This was all Marine Le Pen's father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, ever wanted. His daughter, on the other hand, wants power. 

Thursday, 9 March 2017

Carl Jung on good and evil

Filling the conscious mind with ideal conceptions is a characteristic of Western theosophy, but not the confrontation with the shadow and the world of darkness. One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious.

It is a fact that cannot be denied: the wickedness of others becomes our own wickedness because it kindles something evil in our own hearts.

Wednesday, 8 March 2017

Why I don't like International Women's Day


A week ago sunny weather arrived in time for Mărţişor. Time to walk
hatless and scarfless along Calea Victoriei in the spring
sunshine.

Romanians consider that spring starts on March 1 (
Mărţişor) and men here
celebrate it by offering mărţişoare to women. A mărţişor is a trinket,
usually by peasants who come to Bucharest to sell them,
though some fortunate ladies receive expensive versions of mărţişoare
encrusted with gems.


If you failed to invite a lady for dinner on Mărţişor today you have a
second chance, because March 8th is International Women's Day. It is a day which, if it is noticed at all in the West, is marked by left-wingers and feminists. In Romania it is a very big thing but, after more than forty years of left-wing ideas and political correctness, it is simply about giving women presents and inviting them to dinner.

A very pleasant custom but, still, I dislike IWD because it is Marxist.

Monday, 6 March 2017

One United People



I just came across by chance these words of the American revolutionary John Jay, in the Federalist Papers 2 (October 31, 1787):

With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people — a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.
Readers know that I am alarmed by attempts to turn European countries into 'proposition nations' united by values. The USA and other new countries founded by European colonists are not ethnic states but I am not convinced that they are proposition nations either. The USA's core identity is (17th and 18th century) British. It seems that in 1787 it was also more or less a European-style ethnic state, despite the many German and other settlers. Franklin complained about how badly the Germans spoke English and how they had no feeling for freedom.